HAHAHA

Aug. 29th, 2008 12:42 pm
mcity: (Default)
[personal profile] mcity
But new, more egregious terminologies have now been invented that will never be found infiltrating non-academic fora.

Writing on Cambridge Common, a Harvard-related blog whose contributors hail from the far left, Katherine E.S. Loncke ’08 calls a particular line of reasoning “disturbingly vapid [and] heteronormative.”
This article was written just three years ago. I see bloggers throwing around that term all the time.

In all seriousness, most definitions of the term I can find define it as thinking presuming a hetrosexual gender binary is normal. Given that meaning, why do I keep seeing it being used to refer to something akin to male chauvinism, or a hetronormative patriarchy*? Isn't women ogling men just as heteronormative? And what is up with Urban Dict's definition?

A pervasive and institutionalized ideological system that naturalizes heterosexuality as universal; it must continually reproduce itself to maintain hegemony over other non-normative sexualities and ways of identity construction.

marriage, traditional family values, the Christian Coalition, suburbia, 'the American Dream'
And why is any heteronormative person automatically thought to be a white-bread, Christian conservative, and therefore wrong? Isn't that, I dunno, bigotry?

*It disturbs me at how good I am at stringing these concepts together.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

2025

S M T W T F S

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 10:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios